I've got a lot of confidence in the data from the training crowd source project
The numbers there however indicate this harsher scenario:
47 M =90%
46 M =81%
45 M =72%
44 M =65%
43 M =58%
So 45:32 would cost closer to 26% or so
Except that those numbers were not based on any sort of analysis, just as placeholders. The related messages:
(203921.182)Wozzvt posted (in response to yellowcake's question):
Here is my question....
I had a player get 44 minutes at C, he also got 16 at PF(due to a foul out)..So do I train 1 position or 2?
I have always thouht that 44 minutes(40 and above) for 1 position training(ID) would be worth more than the 48 minutes(full training) for 2 position. Well, I went back and checked my old trainings and it seems the 44 minutes was only a .57 out of the 1(full training for 1 position) where when I did 2 position ID in the offseason it gave me a .70 for the fulltraining. Are these numbers for partial trainings accurate?
no... it was just a guess i put in (min/48)^3 just to be able to have something. that's one of the things on the list to look at closely, though.
I don't see anything in the thread that indicates they ever updated that based on any analysis, but of course I don't see anything that says they didn't either.
