The malaysia game you won because the game took your RnG decision, and exploited the weak link of their defense (the 20 year old SF). Their SG was quite feast or famine with the ball, meaning he probably had good driving and very good handling but very mediocre passing (thinking 7-9). He took most of the LI shots while assisting often enough and rarely turning the ball over, thus my general opinion. If you had clamped down on OD in a man situation with a 13 OD or better guard, i anticipate he struggles even more to get balls into the man down low, and furthermore i would also suspect the SF's lack of TSP would lead to him shooting more. So the end result is probably more lower quality shots that net you some rebound opportunities, and equal out some of the loss you incur from the offensive rebounds droping in a 2-3. Just my take on whether or not it was responsible for that win (i'd lean not really, i think you with either way most of the time).