BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Lets talk about SB

Lets talk about SB

Set priority
Show messages by
From: rigno

This Post:
00
262742.116 in reply to 262742.113
Date: 11/17/2014 4:14:17 PM
Sea Urchins
Serie A
Overall Posts Rated:
6464
Preventing with ID. Work on the shot with SB . I tattoo this on my arm

Yeah, my bad. SB not only blocks the shots but works to limit the damage.
Using your data (your first big) we can say that if the opponent takes 20 FGA he will go 6 times to the rim and 1 time to the for two FT. With more ID the opponent will have less FGA. Is this ok?

I agree that with less ID my player will prevents less shot. And this is the point: more FTA for the opponent (and less for his teammates) but more power to blocks or alters those "bonus" shots.
Maybe what I've not understand is why he will give more open shots (=easy points).

This Post:
00
262742.117 in reply to 262742.114
Date: 11/17/2014 4:18:43 PM
Sea Urchins
Serie A
Overall Posts Rated:
6464
With less ID your player could end up defending less shots. He will be to slow/weak to defend his opponent which could result in open shots. It's true that your guy could block more shots if you give him +2 SB with -1 ID. But I would prefer a big which defends 15 shot attempts/game rather than one which only defends 10 shot/attempts/game.
This is the trade-off that would be interesting to measure at a given level of OD vs Flow. Then if we have a rough idea of how much an extra point in ID increases the successful defense (by reducing the unguarded shot overall number) and how much SB does the same (by reducing the FG% on guarded shots), we could have a much better idea of what builds are preferable. Granted, SB also gives a small contribution to reducing the number of unguarded shots too, trains probably faster, it's cheaper in the salary formula and it should become increasingly beneficial at higher OD levels.

Yeah mate! This is the focal point of my idea. In the same match does it work better a 15/15 ID/SB or a 14/17?

This Post:
00
262742.122 in reply to 262742.113
Date: 11/18/2014 10:52:44 AM
Zwölf
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
687687
Second Team:
Zwölf 2
You are missing a very important point here. SB alters shots. Your player could finish a game with 0 blks, but hold his opponent to 0-10 shots. The number of blocked shots isn't that important, it's the defensive benifit which counts. I have two bigs with a shot blocking ratio of 35%.
The first one has 5% shooting foul, 30% altered shots and 30% failed actions --> the opponent scored.
The second one has 0% shooting fouls, 53% altered shots and only 12% failed actions. You see, they have the same % of blocked shots but different impacts on my defense.

In this example, are the procentages of all cases where the particular player has tried to defend a shot (can be seen in the play-by-play as "somebody shoots...with your player defending closely" or other comment of that sort)? And then simply judging by the result like this: scored-->failed action, miss with no block--> altered shot, miss with block-->blocked, foul-->shooting foul. Or did I get it all wrong?

This Post:
00
262742.125 in reply to 262742.123
Date: 11/18/2014 11:33:10 AM
Zwölf
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
687687
Second Team:
Zwölf 2
Thanks. Got to collect similar data of my own players too, as I'm building a 3-2-zone SB team, but currently have still two old school LI-centers.

Advertisement