BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Pakistan, the country with no manager

Pakistan, the country with no manager

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
261863.277 in reply to 261863.272
Date: 10/17/2015 10:18:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5353
I'm 100% OK with this as well!

Might just be easier to aggregate nations into macro-nations whilst keeping one's home-based as the local country. Think KHL (sans Putin on Skates and money) in Hockey and so forth.

This Post:
00
261863.280 in reply to 261863.279
Date: 10/19/2015 3:40:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
We have too many nations for the number of users we have.

BB is about a 10 nation size right now. 20 tops. We have 70 or so too many DIs.


We got 99 nations but...

The problem is, that there is no solid plan on how to merge all the nations and plenty users would be in a position to lose status/money/players... A full reset would be a possible option, but then again many many people would quit instanteniously.

Right now its too fudged up to be fixed without major damage inflicted... So probably leaving it as it is and doing nothing (like usual) is the only way to go.

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
This Post:
00
261863.282 in reply to 261863.281
Date: 10/19/2015 10:07:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
Taking the 20% or so in the 70 too many nations and merging them wont impact their main customers meanwhile opening the door to the 20% or so to stop shrinking and expand a little.


I wanted to start a discussion on this topic, but unfortunately it was labelled as a suggestion and thus moved to the trashcan (suggestions-board).

I think the game would be sustainable with like two dozen nations, wiping out the other countries would only affect like 10% of the users.

I myself would not like to play in a big nation, as I am used the non-existing difficulty and adapting to a more challenging way to play the game would be a tough pill to swallow. But on the other hand, countries with less than a full Div II are boring as hell.

So maybe removing the micronations with less than 50 users AND changing the league structure for smaller countries to a 1-2-4-8, or even 1-1-2-4 (DIV I, 2, 3, 4) pyramid, could help too.

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
This Post:
00
261863.285 in reply to 261863.284
Date: 10/24/2015 7:26:25 AM
TrenseRI
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
36233623
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
It's not that hard to do, as you said, we did it for Utopia, we can do it for others. The real question is should we do it, not just in which way to implement it and where to do it. As always, some people would like it, some hate it, and changing fundamental things like this isn't really always accepted well.

This Post:
00
261863.287 in reply to 261863.286
Date: 10/25/2015 6:33:36 AM
TrenseRI
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
36233623
Second Team:
ChiLeaders
Also, it would definitely cater to your preference. I doubt you'd pay for a national league, am I right? As a BB, I have to consider everyone's position, not just my own.

Advertisement