So i noticed something that i thought would make for some good discussion. I was analyzing the stats from each conference over the past couple seasons, and i noticed a trend. The most prolific offenses always seem to be from the Big 8 and the toughest defenses always seem to be from the Great 8. I looked at the stats over the past 4 season in IV.10 and came up with these results: out of the 4 seasons i looked at, the best defense team was in the great 8 3 out of the 4 seasons, and the best offense came from the big 8 all 4 seasons.
But i goes further than that. I took the 3 highest scoring offenses from each season and ranked them, which equaled to 12 total spots for my study. Out of the 12 spots, 11 of the 12 spots belonged to teams from the big 8. I did the same thing for defense and out of the 12 spots, 9 out of the 12 spots belonged to teams from the great 8.
But the next stat seems to contradict my theory. I added up all the points scored and points allowed for each season, and found the difference between the two conference:
Season 24: Big 8 allowed 906 points more than Great 8
Great 8 scored 510 points more than Big 8
Season 25: Big 8 allowed 1523 points more than Great 8
Great 8 scored 133 points more than Big 8
Season 26: Great 8 allowed 611 points more than Big 8
Great 8 scored 527 points more than Big 8
Season 27: Great 8 allowed 331 points more than Big 8
Big 8 scored 453 points more than Great 8
So it seems from this data that while the best teams seem to fit my initial model, the bottom half of these conferences seem to overpower the effect and reveres the model.
Any other thought?