BuzzerBeater
BuzzerBeater Forums
BB Global (English) > Training Speed Analysis
Back to the Sneak Peek
BB Global (English)
Training Speed Analysis
1000
Vote for BuzzerBeater
57
fouls per game
4
Scrimmage
6
/closed
1
TL Auctions aren't completing!
2
Scrimmage Ad Thread 2/27-3/4
26
CLOSED
1
Some page links broken
1
/closed
1
Officemate Invitation
2
help
2
wich tactic to use
2
Is a real PG important?
2
view live is n/a for cup
2
the finer points of tactics
2
Lost Transfer
1
wrong starters...
2
Training Speed Analysis 2
3
Compensation fees nt-players
11
<
>
Favorite Folders
Training Speed Analysis
(thread closed)
Set priority
High
Normal
Low
Show messages by
Everybody
Edju (4)
WFU03 (3)
Superfly Guy (2)
Calum (2)
RiP (1)
GM-kozlodoev (2)
Ali24 (1)
docend24 (1)
atabakin (1)
Lux4 (3)
Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)
From:
GM-JuicePats
To:
left hand path
This Post:
0
381.978
in reply to
381.976
Date: 02/20/2009 10:36:32
Overall Posts Rated:
303
after a few months i doubt that it is important how many players you train.
It definitely is very important.
NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Message deleted
From:
Calum
To:
GM-JuicePats
This Post:
0
381.980
in reply to
381.978
Date: 02/21/2009 19:18:18
Overall Posts Rated:
394
Just wondering Juice. You have any thoughts on this?
Do you think that training 2 positions e.g PG/SG, equates to exactly half as much training per person as one position (PG).
Or do you think you get more overall training points (shall we say) if you train more postions to be shared out.
I'd be interested in this as it could well mean that it's a lot better to just train 1 position (if you can minute manage that is)
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
GM-JuicePats
To:
Calum
This Post:
0
381.981
in reply to
381.980
Date: 02/21/2009 19:23:35
Overall Posts Rated:
303
I really don't know, but I'd be surprised if you got more overall training from 2 positions than one.
NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
atabakin
To:
GM-JuicePats
This Post:
0
381.982
in reply to
381.981
Date: 02/21/2009 19:31:20
Overall Posts Rated:
47
I would argue that if you manage your minutes correctly, training two positions could provide more total value than training one position, if the information in the first post of this thread is correct. Let's use passing as an example and pretend you manage your minutes perfectly, assuming a three game week and each player plays exactly 48 minutes.
Training PG takes 1-2 weeks per pop. If we call that 1.5 weeks, this means that training passing for PG results in .67 pops per trainee. Three trainees would thus get 2 pops
Training PG/SG takes 2-3 weeks per pop. If we call that 2.5 weeks, this means that training passing for PG/SG results in .40 pops per trainee. Six trainees would thus get 2.4 pops.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Calum
To:
GM-JuicePats
This Post:
0
381.983
in reply to
381.981
Date: 02/21/2009 19:31:36
Overall Posts Rated:
394
coolio. an interesting one anyway.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
GM-JuicePats
To:
atabakin
This Post:
0
381.984
in reply to
381.982
Date: 02/21/2009 19:50:11
Overall Posts Rated:
303
That's assuming all of that info is correct.
There's no real way to completely confirm that.
NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Message deleted
Message deleted
Message deleted
Disable Emoticons and Images