One position trains faster than 2 pos. Because of this you will be able to sell your players for more money.
When you're finished training, you'll have players of exactly the same caliber, regardless of how you train them -- they're limited by their potential. True, maybe they will be 2 seasons younger (22 instead of 24, or something like that), but with capped players this is not relevant. So you really won't be selling anyone for more money.
Look at their potentials, they arent benchwarmers or something like this. If you try to sell a player when he is 20 the 6 pops more because you sp trained him are important for their price. If he trains the players correctly he wont be able to keep his players longer than 20-21 cause their salaries rise too far.
You dont have to play with so many trainees, which means no sacrifices for zhe league games.
The user in question is a V division US team. His trainees will be his best players in about half a season, so he probably wants to have as many trainees in the line-up as he can.
You got a point there.
Its easier to manage the minutes. You dont need as many players as with 2 pos, so you will have a cheaper team.
It's probably much easier to manage the minutes for 5 players in a 2-position training routine than it is for 3 players in 1-position training routine, and training 2 players in a 1-position training routine is not economically effective.
I think its pretty easy to manage minutes in 1-pos training. Just let all three guys play one complete game. And you wont get the full minutes, if you just train 5 guys. 48 minutes per week wasted.
I think its better for a DV team to train 2-pos too.
I just wanted to answer his question, why someone would train single-pos,
leaving out the possibility of a NT player oc.
Last edited by karagunis at 7/23/2010 6:38:38 PM