BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Can a player pop twice a week?

Can a player pop twice a week?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
150972.85 in reply to 150972.84
Date: 7/14/2010 8:23:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
that would mean inside shot would train min 1.0 . so i highly doubt it.

This Post:
00
150972.87 in reply to 150972.86
Date: 7/14/2010 10:33:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
not yer , its wrong you cant pop 2 levels in 1 training update

This Post:
00
150972.89 in reply to 150972.88
Date: 7/14/2010 3:07:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
You seem to be too unsure, I would truly remember which skill has popped two levels one week and using which training.

From: zyler

This Post:
00
150972.90 in reply to 150972.89
Date: 7/14/2010 3:10:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
i wouldnt , because it cant happen. as said t would mean a training would have to push a main skill up by a min 1.0 , no trainings do this.

This Post:
00
150972.93 in reply to 150972.83
Date: 7/14/2010 11:21:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Just out of interest when you talk about a 'luck factor' what do you actually mean? Do u think there is a random element where some weeks players get more training at full training then other weeks?


Yes. That's the idea, but I don't think that I ever insisted that it's 100% true. For some reason he just wants to hang on to it like a life saver even though it's not crucial to the main subject, anyways. The reason I am having these thoughts is that I have been having some, at least from my experience, weired results with team training recently. I may or may not be jumping to conclusions that it also applies to regular training, but until a BB says otherwise I am going to assume that it is potentially possible. In the long run I don't think that it makes a huge difference anyways. Presumably it would even out for the most part anyhow if indeed real.

This Post:
00
150972.94 in reply to 150972.82
Date: 7/14/2010 11:28:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
The difference I see is that my "opinion" is something that everyone else happens to agree with and is more likely than yours. For example, you have not provided any evidence that a double pop is possible, nor any evidence that there is a luck factor in training, so I have not dismissed any evidence because you have provided none.


Just because you chose to ignore it and practically assumed that I am lying when I told you that I had heard of it from reputable sources doesn't mean that I hadn't provided it. And do you really want to talk about how many people do or don't agree with me. I am not the one sporting a 2 1/2 ball rating. I would say that if you live in a glass castle you shouldn't throw stones.

Advertisement