BuzzerBeater Forums

"Karangula: Do you calculate gameshape by the minutes played in a single week or do you take more than a single week to calculate gameshape? (208622.43)
Boh!! :)"

E te pareva!!!

"Karangula: Do you calculate gameshape by the minutes played in a single week or do you take more than a single week to calculate gameshape? (208622.43)
I can't disclose that :)"

E te pareva!!!

"Karangula: Do you calculate gameshape by the minutes played in a single week or do you take more than a single week to calculate gameshape? (208622.43)
I can't disclose that :)"

E te pareva!!!

Quindi tutti a pompare SB, che diamine!

ti pigliano per il cuBo.

lo pensavo anch'io, ma leggi qui:

Coco: Charles used to say that one of the design principles of the game was that there shouldn't be a dominant strategy. (1) If the BB's think that LI is now a dominant strategy, what is being done to steer the game away from it? (2) If they think it's not, what standard must be met to prove the claim that some strategy is dominant? (208622.31)

Great question and a tricky one. It's true, most of the people play LI now. Does that make it dominant? Maybe so, I can't say for certain, but looking at B3, it sure seems like it. There's another side of that coin that needs to be addressed. People need to modify their team tactics in a way that would make them better at defending LI, and currently, some of the misconceptions like the value of shot blocking and others prevent them from doing so. A little bit of creativity and research into the way real defense works is needed too. Also, not having players with good shot range also prevents teams from winning games with perimeter based tactics. All these contributed to the situation we are in now. The fact that inside players are cheaper than outside players certainly doesn't help the issue. Currently, no changes in the GE are planned and it's still unclear if we're going to do anything about it.

non lo so, ma sarà mica che la maggiore incisività di stoppata, che hanno introdotto qualche stagione fa, per contro, ha causato questo spostamento verso le tattiche interne??! dato che fino a 5-6 stagioni fa era uno strazio sul forum con tutti a dire che le tattiche esterne funzionavano meglio...
cioè, avranno mica ridotto l'incisività di ID a favore di SB, che però non notiamo visto che quasi tutti evitiamo SB come la peste??

Quindi tutti a pompare SB, che diamine!

ti pigliano per il cuBo.

lo pensavo anch'io, ma leggi qui:

Coco: Charles used to say that one of the design principles of the game was that there shouldn't be a dominant strategy. (1) If the BB's think that LI is now a dominant strategy, what is being done to steer the game away from it? (2) If they think it's not, what standard must be met to prove the claim that some strategy is dominant? (208622.31)

Great question and a tricky one. It's true, most of the people play LI now. Does that make it dominant? Maybe so, I can't say for certain, but looking at B3, it sure seems like it. There's another side of that coin that needs to be addressed. People need to modify their team tactics in a way that would make them better at defending LI, and currently, some of the misconceptions like the value of shot blocking and others prevent them from doing so. A little bit of creativity and research into the way real defense works is needed too. Also, not having players with good shot range also prevents teams from winning games with perimeter based tactics. All these contributed to the situation we are in now. The fact that inside players are cheaper than outside players certainly doesn't help the issue. Currently, no changes in the GE are planned and it's still unclear if we're going to do anything about it.

non lo so, ma sarà mica che la maggiore incisività di stoppata, che hanno introdotto qualche stagione fa, per contro, ha causato questo spostamento verso le tattiche interne??! dato che fino a 5-6 stagioni fa era uno strazio sul forum con tutti a dire che le tattiche esterne funzionavano meglio...
cioè, avranno mica ridotto l'incisività di ID a favore di SB, che però non notiamo visto che quasi tutti evitiamo SB come la peste??

in pratica avremo nani con 20 in JR e lunghi con 20 in SB. Alimentare.

mi preoccupa la frase in grassetto...