BuzzerBeater Forums

There are plenty of well know mistakes in the training thread and unless the comment in the FAQ is by a BB it's just an opinion, as well. That's not important, though, because it's just not a deciding factor in this equation anyway. But you are definitely right about one thing. I don't want to talk about it anymore. It's pointless to try and prove anything to anyone who already has their mind made up before they even look at the evidence. Obviously this whole subject is trivial, but the important thing about it is this is how a lot of people here operate. Based on guesses and conjecture, and accept it as fact. I only took exception with the degree of certainty with which he was talking and how vigorously he chose to defend his view to be nothing less than fact were in reality it is nothing more than his unsubstantiated opinion, to which he is surely entitled as long as he presents it as such.

You could argue that almost nothing in this game can be "proven". However, the statement I gave is what the majority of people believe, and unless there is factual evidence, or even strong circumstantial evidence, to support your theory, people shouldn't be told that there is a luck factor in training. You seem to think that I am vigorously defending my view, but it seems to me that everyone in this thread agrees with my point of view and accepts it as fact. No one yet has agreed with you.

no ones agreed with him because his completely wrong.

I think you are finally starting to get it. That is exactly what I have been trying to explain to you all along. I have an opinion. No more, no less. If I have no proof other than a hunch which could end up been nothing more than just that. That's how I present it. I wouldn't at all be surprised if there was no luck factor in training. I happen to think that it's possible. But, that's just my opinion and I don't try to pass it for anything other than that. You on the other hand have an opinion that double pops are not possible, yet are totally ok with dismissing any and all evidence that it may or may not be true based on nothing else other than a hunch of your own. Do you see the difference?

Last edited by Batman at 7/14/2010 12:26:35 AM

The difference I see is that my "opinion" is something that everyone else happens to agree with and is more likely than yours. For example, you have not provided any evidence that a double pop is possible, nor any evidence that there is a luck factor in training, so I have not dismissed any evidence because you have provided none.

Just out of interest when you talk about a 'luck factor' what do you actually mean? Do u think there is a random element where some weeks players get more training at full training then other weeks?

that would mean inside shot would train min 1.0 . so i highly doubt it.

not yer , its wrong you cant pop 2 levels in 1 training update