BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Fouls

Fouls

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Kukoc

To: Ozzy
This Post:
00
129790.7 in reply to 129790.6
Date: 1/30/2010 4:27:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
What are you actually complaining about?
Let them play -> keeps your players in even with foul trouble. Waits until player get's tired before substituting. More aggressive players might be fouling out early, as playing with foul trouble makes them more ineffective. Helps in cases where you have a player that usually does not foul much and gets those bogus calls in the first quarter.
Sit them -> will make sure you have noone fouling out early.

Both of them are working as intended.

From: Ozzy

This Post:
00
129790.8 in reply to 129790.7
Date: 1/30/2010 5:06:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
First in Game Manual on Tactic page there is nothing about this option. And I thought all this time that this option mean how should my players play in defense. Should they let opponent to play (something like easy defense, small number of fouls...), or sit in their lap (like hard defense, more fauls...). In my language that has sense. But right now I changed the language in BB and saw that translation is totally opposite. And that now has sense :P

But again number of fouls (20-7) is not real :P

From: Kukoc

To: Ozzy
This Post:
00
129790.9 in reply to 129790.8
Date: 1/30/2010 6:53:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
It happens in real life and it also happens here. Perhaps you have more aggressive players. Players have the hidden physicality factor that makes them foul more.

From: Ozzy

This Post:
00
129790.10 in reply to 129790.9
Date: 1/30/2010 8:10:58 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
Are you sure about that hidden physical skill (factor)?

Or all that is just "random"?

From: CrazyEye

To: Ozzy
This Post:
00
129790.11 in reply to 129790.10
Date: 1/30/2010 10:08:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
the bb just ays sometimes those hidden foul factor exist, if their guys usuuallay foul less this is the point even today ;) if your guys fould normally less, this is random.

This Post:
00
129790.12 in reply to 129790.1
Date: 1/30/2010 10:49:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
Do you have a suggestion here?

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
129790.13 in reply to 129790.10
Date: 1/31/2010 7:34:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
485485
a player with a history, a career, there is a tendency that reveals itself over time -- without careful study, just a ballpark estimate, i find players that are close to 3 fouls per game are foul-prone; you can glance over a player's game-by-game and see patterns, too. it can vary, too. my pg can go two, three games and be ok, and then he will have a game where he gets four fouls in the first five minutes. with study, i believe you will find that the foulers are not "random" --

This Post:
00
129790.14 in reply to 129790.12
Date: 1/31/2010 8:09:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
First thank you Hassan Donnelly, I didn't think in that way :)

Do you have a suggestion here?


Of Course I have suggestion! :)

First, I think that experience should be added in this effect! If player is "aggressive" (for example) and if he make 2.8 fouls when he was 19 years old. Then when he is 25 he is much more experienced and that number should be lower!


Message deleted
Message deleted
Message deleted
Advertisement