BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > What position?

What position?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
82306.6 in reply to 82306.5
Date: 3/22/2009 5:41:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
For me thats all SF, and all lacks in defense.


I agree for the defence, especially if they are supposed to be SGs. However, for SFs their inside skills are quite weak. I rather consider them SGs but I am curious how you argue this, CrazyEye?

The second one is interesting as he sould be a great 3point SG. Not really strong at passing but otherwise he could be great in Princeton tactics. (3 pointers or playing the big guys)

This Post:
00
82306.7 in reply to 82306.6
Date: 3/22/2009 5:50:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I rather consider them SGs but I am curious how you argue this, CrazyEye?


i normally won't play then anyway, and someone else brings the SF into the game ;) And as SF they got not that bad, with outside tactics because the lack of OD isn't that hard there, but you got additional problem with ID.

The second one is interesting as he sould be a great 3point SG. Not really strong at passing but otherwise he could be great in Princeton tactics.


i don't see any team who could be great with princeton :) In my eyes this tactic ****, ok sometimes it is usefull to avoid blowout in the friendly but else?