BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Can a player pop twice a week?

Can a player pop twice a week?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
150972.53 in reply to 150972.52
Date: 7/11/2010 6:04:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
What luck factor? Are you saying that the amount received by training each week is random within reason? I disagree.

Well the whole point of this thread was to find out if a skill can pop twice in the same week. i.e. can a skill go from Respectable to Proficient.

This means that a skill must be able to receive more than 1.0 training. Which is not possible at any time regardless of circumstance.

This Post:
00
150972.54 in reply to 150972.53
Date: 7/11/2010 6:08:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
How do you know this, again. You are just guessing. I have heared it from experienced managers who had it happen to them. And as far as the "luck factor" is concerned it's the same thing. Just because you are not aware of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

This Post:
00
150972.55 in reply to 150972.54
Date: 7/11/2010 6:33:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Name 1 experienced manager that claims it has happened to.

As for the luck factor, I can't prove it doesn't exist. Can you prove it does?

This Post:
00
150972.56 in reply to 150972.55
Date: 7/11/2010 7:26:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Lol. You are just being childish. I don't have to prove anything to you. And are you now backtracking. A second ago you were sure of yourself. You really should stop trying to pass your own opinion for a fact. That's why I don't have to prove it to you. Because it is not hard fact but just my experience and experience of many others. Just because you believe it to be true doesn't mean it is. As for the manager it wasn't just one, but the one in particular that I can recall I believe was GM-JohnnyB.

This Post:
00
150972.57 in reply to 150972.56
Date: 7/11/2010 7:33:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
How am I backtracking? I am still sure. Nothing in my post indicates that I am any less sure.
So what you are saying is that you have a different opinion, but with no proof to back it up?
Okay I'll ask the GM and see what he says, or if he read this hopefully he can provide his experience.

Perhaps the illusion of luck comes from varying sublevels.

This Post:
00
150972.58 in reply to 150972.57
Date: 7/11/2010 8:10:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Off course you are not backtracking. In case you missed it I sad it in jest. Why would you. You are obviously too stubborn to admit that God forbid it is possible that you might be wrong. And even than your response is "prove it" when you yourself can't prove squat.

From: Jason

This Post:
00
150972.59 in reply to 150972.58
Date: 7/11/2010 8:44:25 PM
Arizona Desert Storm
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
11401140
Okay, children...don't MAKE me pull this car over!! hahaha LOL

You two should sell tickets to your show, this is good stuff!!! :-)

This Post:
00
150972.60 in reply to 150972.58
Date: 7/11/2010 9:12:52 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Hard to catch jest over the internet :P
I said that it can't happen, and everyone else in this thread has similar thoughts except you. So the majority has the same thoughts as me. So while I can't prove it, it is definitely the prevailing opinion. If I asked on the forums whether my player has a hidden feeling attribute and if he gets sad if he isn't listed as the starter on my team, then people would laugh and say no obviously. If someone then came along saying that there is a hidden feeling attribute then the onus would be on this person to prove his case. Not for the others to prove that there is no hidden attribute.
In the same way, the onus is on you to prove that there is a luck factor. Not on me.

This Post:
00
150972.61 in reply to 150972.60
Date: 7/11/2010 10:58:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4141
If someone then came along saying that there is a hidden feeling attribute then the onus would be on this person to prove his case. Not for the others to prove that there is no hidden attribute.


A provisionally accepted hypothesis isn't exempt from scrutiny. I think you just described groupthink. My money is still on you to win the fight though. You sound really smart.

Last edited by bonespawn at 7/11/2010 10:59:21 PM

This Post:
00
150972.62 in reply to 150972.61
Date: 7/11/2010 11:07:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
I agree that the hypothesis I put forward isn't exempt from scrutiny, but considering it is the prevailing opinion, for him to come up with a different hypothesis that is less likely to be true with no proof to back it up is pointless.

I bet if I came along and said I am God's messenger, and I had a bunch of people that believed me, then the majority of people would still doubt me. The onus is on me to then prove I am God's messenger. I can't just turn around and say well you can't prove that I am not God's messenger so why should I have to prove that I am or something :P hahahaha

"My money is still on you to win the fight though. You sound really smart."
hahaha thanks :P

This Post:
00
150972.63 in reply to 150972.62
Date: 7/11/2010 11:20:29 PM
Arizona Desert Storm
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
11401140
Well?? What message did God give you to tell me? :-)

Advertisement