BuzzerBeater Forums

I'm a little disappointed in your discussion method. It seems you don't even leave some room for other opinions. It seems that you only think yours is right and others are all wrong. Maybe i'm wrong there, at least I hope I'm wrong.
But posts like this are just really weird:

This thread has nonsense, i repeat it and the BBs can repeat it again.

How can you ever know the opinion of another person, like a BB? You just can't, and you can't just call opinions other than yours 'nonsense'. That's just completely wrong.

I see a lot of discussion here, but again my post about the contribution vs salary is ignored most of the time. Maybe because everyone accepts it as the truth or something?

I would like to hear some other arguments about that, instead of just the simple words "I disagree"

The point was that a 42k salary Center contributes less or equal to the team ratings as a 15k Guard.
You can read my whole post here: (20034.29)

Oh your point here:

If a shooting guard trainer starts to train ONLY JS,JR an OD he will be in the same problems,

It just not true. Andre posted a perfect example of a player with 13k who had only JS,JR and OD.


Last edited by BB-Patrick at 3/23/2008 3:20:17 PM

Yeah that's a good point about the two position training, but I do miss the link with the salary/team contribution part?

As far as salary is concerned, my impression is that it depends on the relevance of the skills for the position. Therefore, since guards have more relevant skill, this clearly drives their wages down, because you can't train all of them.

Yeah I do think it works like this right now. But I think that's wrong or not fair.

Salarycalculation shouldn't look at the relevance and amount of skills per position, but it should look at the contribution of the players to the ratings.
The way it works right now is that you can relatively boost your outside ratings more easy (lower skills gets higher ratings in comparison to centers) than inside ratings, while you got a lower salary. Like I said before if you play 4 inside players with a total of 100k salary you will get the same ratings as 4 guards with a total of 50k salary.

It just not true. Andre posted a perfect example of a player with 13k who had only JS,JR and OD.

Maybe my English is not to good and i translate what i think using expressions from Spanish in a very literal way.

Im sorry if it sounds bad.

The play that Andre posted has sensational JS (2 positions train), prominent JR and strong OD.

We have to se the salary of a player that has sensational (12) RBD (2 positions trains), prominent (10) IS and strong (8) ID. And then compare the salaries.

I have seen this one (its hard to find but you can try): (2671723)
15k and 11 in Rebounding, 9 in IS and 9 in ID. It seems nearly the same, and the salary is nearly the same. (a guy with 10-10-10 in the primaries has a bigger wage than a guy with (13-10-7) in his primaries.

And like Ebustelo said, the game is the same for everybody!!! and if you see what happens when you train the 3 primaries (look at italian Shooting guards in the next wage update)... take a decission, but dont complain to change the game.