838 online at 20:29:37

BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Player ability bonus on offense

Player ability bonus on offense

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
194736.5 in reply to 194736.4
Date: 8/21/2011 3:25:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369
I think it would be interesting... you have a team of 12 players with all different abilities, and you have to choose which "horse you´d like to ride"

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
This Post:
00
194736.6 in reply to 194736.5
Date: 8/21/2011 4:27:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Eventually it comes down to teams owning one tactic players. You have 4 starters suitable for run and gun. You would not buy an inside spec guy from TL now would you? Owning 5 different spec players as starters, makes you a lot weaker, than a team that has 5 starters suitable for one offence. Eventually it will create a distortion on the TL (if users lean on one offence more than others).

This Post:
00
194736.7 in reply to 194736.6
Date: 8/21/2011 4:31:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369
Well, it makes you easier to scout once your players all have the same special offense. I am switching lineups and offenses all the time to some degree, so I guess I´d try to get at least two different offense thingies going for my team.

Actually, if the bonus is small enough to not blast games but simply add a little (like .2 gameshape bonus in that very tactic) it could be quite fun.

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
This Post:
00
194736.8 in reply to 194736.6
Date: 8/21/2011 6:22:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
Well, it doesn't have to be one tactic. It could be 2 or maybe up to 3 types of offenses that they are more suitable to. Not as much to take away from the game, but just a little bit more strategy to think about when you decide on the starter/backups and the type of offense you run. Imagine a player has one type of offense they are good at with a high level of ability and the other has 3 types of offenses with a lesser degree of ability. Who do you get and would that one be right for the team. As we all know, a group of superstars is not going to win a championship but getting the right pieces on your team is what makes you win.

Message deleted
This Post:
00
194736.10 in reply to 194736.8
Date: 8/22/2011 7:10:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but you need all player with the same combinations, or same two tacics in their profile.

Could you by that, i think that would be quite difficult. And you had to consider the strength already at a trainee stage, because with the skills player already are specialised to some tactics where they would perform better then with others.

This Post:
00
194736.11 in reply to 194736.8
Date: 8/22/2011 9:01:03 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
It's kind of sounding like: "let's make player one play great on tuesday, player 2 on thursday, player 3 on saturday". You should play some players on a given day where they get a bonus. With your suggestion, you remove more strategy instead of gaining more tactical options. You would have one best strategy because of player suggested offence and rest would be suboptimal every time.

This Post:
00
194736.12 in reply to 194736.10
Date: 8/22/2011 10:46:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
Yes, that is what I am getting at. You would have to do that which adds to who would be the right fit for your team and not just the best player available. When you look at it, it is pretty impossible for a player to be equally skilled at every single offensive or defensive set there is.

I understand what you mean, but how about(which I even think is impossible to do in this game) for a player to "learn" to be skilled(i.e. your players that are drafted) from the amount of time they play in offensive and defensive sets by the amount of games they play in it.

But, I really don't know how often div I and div II leagues change their tactics. If they change often, I can understand why it doesn't work. My guess they use one tactic more than the others combined.

This Post:
00
194736.13 in reply to 194736.11
Date: 8/22/2011 10:49:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13691369
Only if you build your team like that. You might aswell build a team which can play 4-5 different tactics with different lineups and "only" two (then key) players getting their bonus that night.

I doubt that a team getting bonus on 5 positions while beeing predictable is better than a team able to play 4 offenses with "only'" two guys getting their bonus while the team is unpredictable.

Zwei Dinge sind unendlich, die Dummheit und das All...
This Post:
00
194736.14 in reply to 194736.11
Date: 8/22/2011 10:55:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
But that is what is going on right now. You take the low post option and the motion option with the focus on the SG, I will bet that the SG is going to score more points in the motion offense. There are SG's that are skilled in backing down their defender and scoring in the low post. My idea was to set it up so you don't limit your "scoring machine" SG

This Post:
00
194736.15 in reply to 194736.13
Date: 8/22/2011 3:51:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Only if you build your team like that. You might aswell build a team which can play 4-5 different tactics with different lineups and "only" two (then key) players getting their bonus that night.
What's the point of this at all? You can already do this by choosing different offences.
If you are seriously thinking that a team with everyone specialised in motion (10 players, with 5 starters being stronger than backups) does worse than a team with mixed specs (10 players equal in strenght to play different tacs) while using the same total salary, then this suggestion kind of falls flat and seems like a cosmetic random change, that really adds nothing to the game...

Advertisement