223 online at 04:13:06

BuzzerBeater Forums

Scotland - I.1 > Relegation

Relegation

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Taintum
This Post:
00
154787.4 in reply to 154787.3
Date: 8/21/2010 2:55:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
66
Agree with DBS. And if I may give you a tip...get 3-4 young 18yo outside players and train them for a season or two at least. Outside player are better paid but if you follow what Templar Cavaliers did you are on the right track. I wouldn't be worried of getting relegated...right now if you go in II Division you're pretty sure to be promoted and you get more money as DBS already said...Good luck

This Post:
00
154787.5 in reply to 154787.3
Date: 8/21/2010 3:09:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Don't quite agree with you on that one to be honest. All teams start with the same amount of money and same quality of players (ie. shite). If you look at all the top teams in any league they've been playing for many seasons and you do need patience with this game. You might get to the top quicker if you're tactically astute and financially prudent enough but Rome definitely don't get built in one day.

If you're relegated this season you'd most likely come back up the season next (with 1M prize money) so it's not necessarily a bad thing.

This Post:
00
154787.6 in reply to 154787.5
Date: 8/21/2010 3:19:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Yeah, I'm just kinda learning the ropes, thanks for the advice

This Post:
00
154787.7 in reply to 154787.1
Date: 9/28/2010 2:42:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
half time in the tie breaker and I'm up by one, can i complete the great escape?

This Post:
00
154787.8 in reply to 154787.7
Date: 9/28/2010 2:51:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Are you playing motion offence and 1-3-1 D?

This Post:
00
154787.9 in reply to 154787.8
Date: 9/28/2010 2:56:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
nope, look inside and 3-2 zone

This Post:
00
154787.10 in reply to 154787.9
Date: 9/28/2010 3:03:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Ah well.

His team's game shape is worse than mine, so you might have a slight chance.
Why not play 1-3-1?

This Post:
00
154787.11 in reply to 154787.10
Date: 9/28/2010 3:08:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I feel 3-2 has worked well for me against him as I won in my last game (although it was a buzzerbeater) and with 1-3-1 not being tested by myself thus far, it would be too risky. I played the first half of the season with man to man, and changed to 2-3 with my teams inside strengths but changed to 3-2 against run and gun teams, let's hope it pulls off!

Last edited by andrew-benson21 at 9/28/2010 3:09:03 PM

This Post:
00
154787.12 in reply to 154787.11
Date: 9/28/2010 3:15:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
You lost your 1st game away by 20+ pts playing 3-2. You won your home game but it's just 1 pt. What made you think you can win away this time just by having better game shape?

This Post:
00
154787.13 in reply to 154787.12
Date: 9/28/2010 3:18:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
well if you had taken a closer look you would of seen I played normal and they played crunch time when they beat me by 20, I know for a fact my enthusiasm is higher too, when both teams have played same effort mine has come out on top.

This Post:
00
154787.14 in reply to 154787.13
Date: 9/28/2010 3:20:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Good luck then.

Advertisement