And I respect that approach 100%.. no issue there.  At the  time same  if  some things are unknown  to this day.  7-8 years . 27-28 seasons strong's  . Then whats wrong  with BB  stepping up and telling it??
 Some  games for this game will  never be  find out on BB. Same issue from my example with chess.  The  starting chess  master  and  creators came out and told and expanded the game. The creator made  starting manual as well  same  as BB, it didn't tell all the ways of play   starting , only starting base.,  Then a chess master came out and told things with permission of the creator on differ style of play. Which none knew how do properly but had a clue of. In small  those ways  were not  popular. Kind of like running 2-3 zone and  Princeton on BB its not popular just good way to lose. he told how to make these unpopular chess  ways strong. A lot BB manager including myself have no idea how merge these together for anything but  a lost game, in my opinion.
 Back to my points. It expanded the game of chess. My point in  small  is why not expand BB in  the same fashion. training and  all that  for certain tactics is  a mystery. I'm saying  not  tell it all  like a interview with Barbra  Walters, No... Im saying be more clear , stop   all scribble scrabble.,  be more up front ,  a manual don't mean anything. Until they show some success with certain tactics, it still a very great  issue. Yes someone had to come out and tell it. It should not take 10-100 yrs and drastic  Ge changes to do so.  All of that  could have been very avoided with just telling things.
 Its does not hurt the game it expands the market. Im not being rude. I saw  won B3  atleast 3 times  . where is his guide to  play this or that that unpopular. Where is his insight on this matter.?
Last edited by Mr. Glass at 11/1/2014 10:06:58 PM