There's nothing stopping a team saying well our 3rd best team wont win much in the stronger league and our weakest team wont win anything anywhere so why not put our worst team in the strong league so our 3rd team can dominate the weaker league... Could get all way to strategic and kind of defeat the purpose.
I would think that we all as managers would respect each other to know where to put people. So as not to have 3 huge teams versing the weaker teams. But really there would would be no advantage to sending your best 3 to the bottom anyway as you are essentially sacrificing half of your points on the overall ladder. I would think having the even playing field would mean higher ranked managers would have even more chances to help lower teams get wins and place higher for there team. I do think that if a particular person wants to play in a league because his friends are in there, there is nothing wrong with that, but i know most of us are happy playing people we haven't played before and to create new rivalries.
I am currently happy with the idea of having what is 3 v 3 v 3 v 3 as it would give me more bragging rights over teams (when we win of course), but at the same time it is actually 6 v 6 v 6 v 6, true i don't play 12 teams but i wouldn't feel that i would get points for playing those particular 12 teams anyway.
In the end it is a shorter season and i know most of us will be around here for a while to come, so that means we are going to have plenty more seasons to grow and eventually crush everyone.
Neeber
When the Beasts Roar all in the way shall be struck down!!!!!