BuzzerBeater Forums

Sure thing yoda, just look back a little further in the thread and you'll see it.

lol well old man lllama is copping a barrage of appeals this week isnt he!

So next up we have Leeeeeeeerrrrrooooooy! with his dispute that Ng Ting Yu should receive the 2 votes over Hemasita Tripathi.

Okie doke so lets get into it...


Well this one is a pickle... Tripathi was clearly the sharks best player, 26 points, 12 boards, 8 assists, 3 steals and 3 blocks is bloody impressive no matter who you are or what the scores, but the fact he got so much scored on him at the other end does weaken his case also. The sharks did get smashed but realistically the only reason they did anything at all was because of Tripathi. 8 assists is technically another 16 points minimum he contributed, so that's 42 points he added on points and assists alone. He may have let up a lot of points but he also had 3 steals and 3 blocks also. 8 assists, 3 blocks and 3 steals is a massive effort from PF.
Ting Yu on the other hand added 22 points and 19 rebounds himself in just 27 minutes which is also impressive, but with Tripathi playing the entire game he didnt put a foot wrong other then allowing a few points through which every Sharks player did. Tripathi was very close to a triple double with 3 steals and blocks tacked on as well. Without him i dont think there would have been much of a contest at all.

So while Ting Yu did have +7 rebounds and only -5 points in less minutes i think its to hard to ignore 8 assists, 3 blocks and 3 steals from a PF in a losing team. I'm gonna have to knock this one back and leave it as it is, i dont think its justifiable to change it purely on less minutes and a few more rebounds. I normally rate the winning team very highly but win or lose Tripathi played a bloody good game, if Sharks had of won he'd have been the clear 3 vote getter so i think him getting 2 is acceptable.

Alright mate. Keep in mind though he was playing against my 4k scrub PF for half the game and still got thrashed defensively.

Anyway that's enough from me, I'll accept the decision even if I don't agree with it. Thanks for your time and effort reviewing my appeal.

Great work C-Cat and as always the Appeals Judge's decision is final. Thank you for your appeal Leeroy and don't forget you will get the chance to appeal again next season.

Wasn't aware the limit was one per season. Okay thanks yoda.

Wasn't aware the limit was one per season.

Its one failed attempt per season. You can keep appealing if C-Cat agrees with your appeal

Ah okay, thanks Monkeybiz.
Is there a list of rules and regulations for the Fishbowl PL that I can go over? Just to avoid miss communications like this again.

First off, the fact you are appealing that your player shouldn't get votes I'm going to take into account an insanity plea!

i think that if it was the other way round and i was fanny it should be consistent and i wouldve got the 3 votes, just trying to keep it consistent and fair.

who knows next week i might appeal against Snzajder getting 3 votes

I am appealing for the http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/32306154/boxscore.aspx

I am arguing why didnt shumkovski get the 3 votes?

mllama argument for that:

both players played equally and Still did a better job defensively as well as putting up similar score in less time.

I can argue that Shumkovski clearly had a better game even though the other C shot 4-5 since shumkovski put him in early foul trouble as well as getting 3 more asts, 2 more steals and a block while shooting 4-5 from the strike so there's an and one in there as well. If you believe in the +/- system then Still had the lowest +/- system so his defense wasnt that good? also the other PF was clearly having a bad night since my backup PF

MIN FG 3FG FT +/- OR TR AST TO STL BLK PF PTS
C N. Shumkovski 30 5 - 10 0 - 0 4 - 5 +14 3 11 4 2 2 1 0 14 13.5
PF P. Still 27 7 - 12 0 - 0 0 - 0 +8 4 11 1 0 0 0 1 14 11.5
PF M. Szczypiór 21 6 - 9 0 - 0 2 - 3 +17 0 5 2 2 1 1 0 14 8.5

I believe that still didnt even deserve a vote rather than 3 votes since shumkovski is clearly 3 with my backup PF and Still fighting it out for the 1.

I'm not sure it is reasonable to allow appeals for games that were from previous rounds. That appeal is for a game 2 rounds ago. If you have an appeal, get it done before the next game.

Can we really appeal against games that were more than a week ago?

What is with all the appeals against me this week? sheesh...

Still had lower +/- cause he played less minutes. Can't read anything into that.

Their points and rebounds are identical. When you take into account foul shots, their scoring efficiency is identical.

Shumkovski had more assists, but also more TOs.

The only real difference I could spot between them was the fact that one's opponent went 3-11, and the other went 4-5. Based on that I think this one is clearcut, and there is nothing here that justifies an overturn (unless of course, we want to argue that Sznajder deserves the 3)