It's a basletball question. That's the context everyone has based their answer on.
I think at this point, Naker either doesn't understand basketball very well or he's just practicing his debating for his law class and arguing for the sake of arguing.It's all gotten a little bit silly now.
Edit to remove potentially defamatory material.TL;DR: The behaviour of many people in my profession makes me very sad. There's a reason why most people despise lawyers.
Edit to remove potentially defamatory material.
Well my argument has nothing to do with basketball, my argument is to do with the programming in this game, and why, because of this programming, 0-8 is better than 1-17 in this game. Real life has no business here.