BuzzerBeater Forums

Australia - IV.7 > Season 5 MVP appeals

Season 5 MVP appeals

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
190297.31 in reply to 190297.30
Date: 8/16/2011 6:28:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
809809
60 point loss and the loser gets 2 points

but my game down 9 with 4 mins to go & finally lose by 15 after the desperation tactics dont work & i get nothing cause noodles doesnt like goldfish (me?)

really doesnt add up i cant find another game that was decided by 15 or less ever where the loser got nothing

total bs

Last edited by abigfishy at 8/16/2011 6:29:58 PM

This Post:
00
190297.32 in reply to 190297.31
Date: 8/16/2011 6:35:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
That's what the appeal process is for :)
And I think that in your game Xie should have gotten at least 1 point.

This Post:
00
190297.33 in reply to 190297.31
Date: 8/16/2011 8:02:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
612612
really doesnt add up i cant find another game that was decided by 15 or less ever where the loser got nothing


i was extremely close to giving Gardner the 1 when Marmots beat LORDY by 14. that would have given Rabid's boys all 6 votes.

i havent looked at your game so i dont know if any of you players deserve a point, but it is definitely possible to give all 6 to a team only winning by 15

Garrie Addison (18085302). The G-Adder striking blows since season 15
This Post:
11
190297.34 in reply to 190297.33
Date: 8/16/2011 8:59:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
809809
i guess i agree that it is possible 4 a team winning by only 15 2 get all 6 votes

but i would think that this would be more of the case where 1 team spanked the other & pulled all their starters & the losing team narrowed the margin in garbage time

but this is the opposite

1:46 mins 2 go i am down 8 & either team could have won but in ct glenelg just got the rolls and dominated our injured and out of shape big guys on the rebounds and only the heroic efforts of xie with 7 rebounds and bay with 10 gave us a chance

our bigs were flogged - starting c had 7 rebs in 48 mins, starting pf has 6 in 48 mins

but xie and bay and barlas were heroic

bay kept his man to 1/8 shooting for 2 points for the game

xie had a 12.5 rating 3rd best in the game and was by far our top scorer with 28 points while the "clearly best" guys only had 30, 27 & 26 - not so clearly best 2 me

xie & bay were our best rebounders despite being sg & sf

but no point appealing cause apparently a loss by 15 is a total blowout & down 8 with 1:46 to go is now garbage time & a 1 sided massacre & noone ever caught up 8 in the last 2 mins

besides cat & noodles are all bffls & wont go against each other so im screwed anyway

maybe we should be more consistent & never give the loser anything ever again cause that is real fair

edit

i totally agree that this is just a bit of fun but being told "im not giving u any votes cause i dont like u" sounds like a joke but when then they really do it it isnt fun it is bullying

Last edited by abigfishy at 8/16/2011 9:16:13 PM

This Post:
55
190297.35 in reply to 190297.34
Date: 8/16/2011 10:34:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
191191
Mate i really think you are over the top with this - Appeal i honestly don't mind and Cat will probably enjoy changing my votes anyhow if he does.

My argument against Xie getting votes is that if you match him up against Ton he was much less efficient 11-25 shooting vs 13-20, had 6 less assists & only 1 more reb. Both teams played man so they essentially played on each other thus i deem Ton more worthy of votes.

The margin of the game means little to me. I just thought those were the best 3 guys and if the stats lines were reversed it would have been Xie getting the votes. I will say it was close and that i found this to be the hardest game to do votes for but IMO (and mine only) that's how the votes fell.

If you are aggrieved enough to want to protest please do as that is why we have that system in place. I will in no way be offended and encourage you to do so as i enjoy looking at how and why people value players performance in games. These votes reflect the way i value performance...it doesn't make ir right or wrong it's just the way i looked at it.

This Post:
22
190297.36 in reply to 190297.35
Date: 8/16/2011 10:37:24 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5757
I nominate Abigfishy for the troll award for taking the MVPs far too seriously.

From: akuma

This Post:
00
190297.37 in reply to 190297.35
Date: 8/16/2011 11:32:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
179179
haha yeah fishy just appeal if you arent happy about it man

This Post:
11
190297.38 in reply to 190297.35
Date: 8/16/2011 11:51:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
809809
u say the margin doesnt matter - so if my 2 injured starters had played and i had won by 15 but everyone else got the same stats u would still have given all 6 points to him?

his bigs had a field day playing against my patheticly depeted bigs all injured or out of shape so their stats were all massivly inflated like they were playing against lucky fans or scrubs in garbage time

whereas i agree that at least ton had to play against a real opponent im not wishing to be dissing him

I nominate Abigfishy for the troll award for taking the MVPs far too seriously.


u guys r probably right so ill back off

ill mention this to my therapist at my next anger management session :)

This Post:
11
190297.39 in reply to 190297.38
Date: 8/17/2011 12:40:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
110110
I'd like to appeal for abigfishy,

Xie deserves 1 MVP point. Why? I'll sing

What's wrong with the world, mama
People livin' like they ain't got no mamas
I think the whole world addicted to the drama
Only attracted to things that'll bring you trauma.
..............
Where is the love, the love, the love.....


No reason, the stats point to Ton performed better, but Xie deserves some lovin'. That is all.

Yo! Yo! D for D best PF in D Aussie BB. D Name is Kye Duffill (10080211), averages nothing but pure amazing! Vote for Duffman!
This Post:
11
190297.40 in reply to 190297.28
Date: 8/17/2011 12:50:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
101101
Good afternoon sir,

Not even gonna bother with an explanation or review for this one, I think its fairly obvious and most other people seem to agree. I've said it plenty of times in previous appeals that If a team gets that smashed clearly no one on their team deserves a vote.

So yeah go nuts I'm happy with the

3 - Sidónio Conceição
2 - Yuri Abruzzese
1 - César Serre

Only thing I'm not happy with is Naker getting another chance to appeal!

From: ezyfrag

This Post:
00
190297.41 in reply to 190297.40
Date: 8/17/2011 12:56:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
286286
Lol!! I guess you will see him again next week!!

Advertisement