BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Better player to train?

Better player to train?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
125251.3 in reply to 125251.1
Date: 12/27/2009 12:52:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Allright all you BBs and GMs tell me if I'm figuring this right:

I'd go with number one because although #2 has better all around numbers, they are not that much better than #1
and #1 is younger and at the same potential so he has more time to get even better.

EDIT:

Almost forgot. Considering their ages, I'd sell one or both of them and go looking for an 18 year old.

Note: I am not giving this as advice per se, but rather to see if the more experienced players out there think I am on the right track.

Last edited by drencrom68 at 12/27/2009 12:54:33 PM

This Post:
00
125251.5 in reply to 125251.4
Date: 12/27/2009 6:37:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Age 24 is a pretty harsh penalty, I think.

This Post:
00
125251.6 in reply to 125251.5
Date: 12/27/2009 6:39:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
maybe if he's in a national team and has high high potential and good height for his position then ok, he can and should be trained, but otherwise 24 is the age to sell

This Post:
00
125251.8 in reply to 125251.7
Date: 12/27/2009 6:48:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
11
Any player at any age is still trainable but it is about what is the most efficient way to train. Using him in a non-trained position or selling him and getting a younger trainee who will train faster is more efficient.

This Post:
00
125251.10 in reply to 125251.9
Date: 12/28/2009 11:38:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Thanks for your opinions, it seems like player 1 is the better solution for the long-term. Just as a little more background on my situation, I train frontcourt players and I would love to keep both but I already have a great center so I have to choose between one of these players for my PF.

It looks like the plan for now should be to hold on to both until I lose in the tournament, then sell player 2 and keep player 1.