BuzzerBeater Forums

Australia - IV.7 > MVP Appeals

MVP Appeals

Set priority
Show messages by
From: C-Cat

This Post:
00
175871.27 in reply to 175871.24
Date: 3/19/2011 3:10:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
101101
okie dokie...

First off, the fact you are appealing that your player shouldn't get votes I'm going to take into account an insanity plea!


There's not a whole lot for me to say here other then a decision, both the for and against points have been made by the appealer and the original voter so I'm not gonna run through it all again and I'll keep it breif.

I'm gonna allow this appeal...

To me it seems a bit of a token vote for Snzajder to get a plebs player in there, they were out classed the whole game and while Snzajder did lead the plebs scoring it wasn't exactly a standout effort it was more a case of the best of the rest...
Leone was much more efficient and I'd say he was a large part in the Hobo's win with his hustle, 3 steals and 3 blocks is impressive. Having said all that we have to consider how attractive llamas mum is, which makes me wanna lean towards him but i guess i should do the right thing...

So go nuts, I have no issue with it being swapped so Leone gets the 1...

From: mllama

This Post:
00
175871.28 in reply to 175871.27
Date: 3/19/2011 3:18:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
326326
Maybe you should give Leone the 3 votes then. If only to see Fanny's reaction at you docking Marnix (the current MVP equal leader) votes

This Post:
00
175871.29 in reply to 175871.28
Date: 3/19/2011 3:29:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
275275
No.

Can you smell what the Hobos are cooking... oh wait its just Roger. (18085274)
From: Leeroy

This Post:
00
175871.30 in reply to 175871.29
Date: 3/19/2011 4:10:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
241241
did you get around to my appeal c-cat?

From: C-Cat

This Post:
00
175871.31 in reply to 175871.30
Date: 3/19/2011 4:19:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
101101
sorry mate got caught up with the one after yours!

I'll get onto it after tonight's game for you mate... Will give you plenty of time for some under the table action to persuade me!

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
175871.32 in reply to 175871.30
Date: 3/19/2011 4:20:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Great work C-Cat as always. The Judge is always right. I hate doing the MVPs in blowouts, really hard to be fair, what is better some nub who owned a lucky fan for 30 of a solid player on the losing team that at least beat his higher class rival.

Leeroy no appeals will be considered until you have stated in detail your case, that is your reasons for the appeal.

From: Leeroy

This Post:
00
175871.33 in reply to 175871.32
Date: 3/19/2011 4:26:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
241241
Sure thing yoda, just look back a little further in the thread and you'll see it.

From: C-Cat

This Post:
00
175871.34 in reply to 175871.23
Date: 3/19/2011 7:49:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
101101
lol well old man lllama is copping a barrage of appeals this week isnt he!

So next up we have Leeeeeeeerrrrrooooooy! with his dispute that Ng Ting Yu should receive the 2 votes over Hemasita Tripathi.

Okie doke so lets get into it...


Well this one is a pickle... Tripathi was clearly the sharks best player, 26 points, 12 boards, 8 assists, 3 steals and 3 blocks is bloody impressive no matter who you are or what the scores, but the fact he got so much scored on him at the other end does weaken his case also. The sharks did get smashed but realistically the only reason they did anything at all was because of Tripathi. 8 assists is technically another 16 points minimum he contributed, so that's 42 points he added on points and assists alone. He may have let up a lot of points but he also had 3 steals and 3 blocks also. 8 assists, 3 blocks and 3 steals is a massive effort from PF.
Ting Yu on the other hand added 22 points and 19 rebounds himself in just 27 minutes which is also impressive, but with Tripathi playing the entire game he didnt put a foot wrong other then allowing a few points through which every Sharks player did. Tripathi was very close to a triple double with 3 steals and blocks tacked on as well. Without him i dont think there would have been much of a contest at all.

So while Ting Yu did have +7 rebounds and only -5 points in less minutes i think its to hard to ignore 8 assists, 3 blocks and 3 steals from a PF in a losing team. I'm gonna have to knock this one back and leave it as it is, i dont think its justifiable to change it purely on less minutes and a few more rebounds. I normally rate the winning team very highly but win or lose Tripathi played a bloody good game, if Sharks had of won he'd have been the clear 3 vote getter so i think him getting 2 is acceptable.

From: Leeroy

This Post:
00
175871.35 in reply to 175871.34
Date: 3/19/2011 8:20:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
241241
Alright mate. Keep in mind though he was playing against my 4k scrub PF for half the game and still got thrashed defensively.

Anyway that's enough from me, I'll accept the decision even if I don't agree with it. Thanks for your time and effort reviewing my appeal.

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
175871.36 in reply to 175871.35
Date: 3/19/2011 5:51:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Great work C-Cat and as always the Appeals Judge's decision is final. Thank you for your appeal Leeroy and don't forget you will get the chance to appeal again next season.

From: Leeroy

This Post:
00
175871.37 in reply to 175871.36
Date: 3/19/2011 6:37:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
241241
Wasn't aware the limit was one per season. Okay thanks yoda.

Advertisement