BuzzerBeater Forums

I do. I have injured players all the time. they have bad game shape and bad stamina most of the time. Why do yoy think im always saying take injures off the game.?





Last edited by Mr. Glass at 12/12/2014 8:46:28 PM

Injures are not cost effective to any team period ,if its about game shape and stamina those can be cost effective to a team.?. what are injuries about ?how does it help the said team, it doesn't. It only hinder's and set teams back with salary and etc. Its not good thing to have on the game. JMo

gs/ staminas really don't matter in lower divison as much as higher, I also think don't we train anything of stamina and game shape the way it goes up so slow and down so much quicker.. Its pretty irrelevant to train it. but I think with certain tactic you need it. So the players can be in the best shape to play them. That is only reason I have not actually asked for those be gone because they can be cost effective and some tactics really need to them to run..

Injuries don't help anyone with no direct time table to come back this information should be a must.. I honest think should be changed to games not weeks. Injured for 2 games or 4 games etc. The weeks thing is just not good its pretty frustrating from my seeing and experience. It hurt cost methods, no recoupe of funds. no injury reserve.. It's just a lost game and lost of revenue. really waste of time if your managerial time, if your in salary bind even more so. Only person happy Is the vs managers of the week.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 12/13/2014 1:38:57 AM

Injuries don't help anyone with no direct time table to come back this information should be a must.. Only person happy Is the vs managers of the week.

Yes.... and? That is the point isn't it?

Injuries are frustrating ad I hate having them for one of my players (I would know as my 21 year old MVP Center is on the U21 NT and was injured for 2 weeks last week), but that is just the game. It happens in real life too, so it would be silly to not have it in the game in my opinion. It is not meant to be beneficial or cost effective. Unpredictability of an injury and when the player will return is also frustrating, but I see no reason to change it, as that is what it is like in real life and that is how it has always been in the game.

Agree ... I think if we want to have no injuries, we should play robot-basketball ...

I don't know why he is still playing if everything is wrong.

But than you have no injury , just total damage. And we fight until the end. Just do or die

I don't think the real life arguement apply here on BB. I dont see how you can inject that and say it happen in real life. nothing on BB is the same or anywhere near real life sports in the injury aspects of the game.

In real life injuries in major sports are cost effective. there is a injury reserves also a said exact date when the player is coming back. Also a recoup of funds salary in relief for the team. BB has none of this?

What are you comparing that's real life to BB.. I don't see anything but the said injury( player hurt)? ok one points I mase was "it is not cost effective". You have not answered that point you just answer me? I think you know this because I'm correct. It does not make you any less of man to say "yes your are right".

I see a big reason to change it. this is a manger's game base on proper timing to compete also finances. If a player is out 2 games. then that manager can adjust for 2 games. it will about 4-5 games before he is back in shape or good form. If its 7 games then you make the right choice to buy another player to sit in for him the season an over haul go a new direction, making some else the star for the remainder of the season with a new piece to the team.. That hurt player would go to injury reserves and the managers would pay half his cost of salary. Thus being cost effective to teams in those time to make the proper move to attain a replacement to move forward to get better..

BB way~ if that player is out 6-7 weeks no direct time table to come back ( please don't inject 6 week injuries are rare in your rebuttal. I'm making valid point comparison with reasoning.). That pretty the whole season and the next one too depending on when it occurs .Before he is back into good form. I dont see any smart reasoning to buy another player when his whole salary is due and next new one as well? You can not plan forward for your franchise and save. That's pretty much wrecked or stuck. Given the gs and stamina drops for him also you will be seeing that as well when you buying a new player ,and the injured player upon return, its just burning money. Given how the game make it so you can not quick sale, like such in certain amount of time. You lose more money with more penalty.. Lost season.. lost revenue.. This is glom &doom on my behalf this is BB reality. Its need to be talked about.

You cant plan ahead in this method of BB way. If you do an your players come back in 4weeks from 6 week injury you just( screwed) your team and your finances with no recoup of funds. You have to take gs/stamina in consideration upon a injury return and buying new players.. .


Think about it. A injury reserves would help BB managers . In a lot of ways

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 12/13/2014 2:40:43 PM

I wanted to stop reading after this (unfortunately I put myself through some more torture trying to read your long paragraphs):

there is a injury reserves also a said exact date when the player is coming back.

No there isn't. Day to day. Week to week. Probable. Questionable. These are all phrases in injury reports. There is rarely an exact date when players will return off of an injury.

What are you comparing that's real life to BB.. I don't see anything but the said injury( player hurt)? ok one points I mase was "it is not cost effective". You have not answered that point you just answer me? I think you know this because I'm correct. It does not make you any less of man to say "yes your are right".

You are most certainly not correct, but you will continue to think you are, as you always do, so I'll just address the "it is not cost effective" point. It is not meant to be cost effective. Injuries in BB are frustrating and unfortunate but are not meant to be cost effective.

Keeping in mind that there are two league games in a week and the injury information is based roughly off of weeks, you can at least gain an estimation, through simple math of how many games your player will probably be out. It is not that big of an issue.

Think about it. A injury reserves would help BB managers . In a lot of ways

Sure they would. So would injuries being taken out of the game completely. So would giving each manager 100k a week for no reason. Just because it helps out BB managers, does not mean it needs to be added into the game.

BB way~ if that player is out 6-7 weeks ... That pretty the whole season and the next one too

Injuries do not carry over from one season to the next in BB. I haven't played BB for long and I'm still learning, but that I know.

No you miss read that badly because I didn't clarify. The next season is the playoff. their gs/stamina injury will carry into the next season which is the playoffs. not meaning the next regular season of play.

sorry I didn't clarify that better. Now at I have now you know a little more of what's been said.