BuzzerBeater Forums

This is not a prob because what c-cat says is the final decision.... I just think it is great how much interest everyone has in the MVP voting!!

Oh, I know. I guess it's just my background coming though.

Dear Mr Cat

I'd like to appeal the following game:(36141547)

The original votes were as follows:

3 - S. Rosales (GV) - Highest rating 12. 22 points 16 rebounds in 28 minutes
2 - F. Cartier (GV) - Game high 29 points. 11 rebounds 3 steals
1 - B. Siffredi (QK) - Led his team in scoring with 19 points 4 assists 5 rebounds

I contend that:

M. Gkonias (Geelong Vipers) had a much better game than B. Siffredi (Quinn Kings) and should be awarded 1 vote.

M. Gkonias had 16 points (6/9 shooting), 8 rebounds, 3 assists, 4 blocks and 2 steals in only 25 minutes.

B. Siffredi had 19 points (8/27 shooting), 5 rebounds, 4 assists and 3 steals in 42 minutes.

Considering that Siffredi took 27 shots to score his 19 points, played 42 minutes (compared to 25 minutes) and had less rebounds, steals and blocks, I think Gkonias had a far better overall game and was much more valuable in the game. It's also worth pointing out that Siffredi's teams lost by 30 points, and while he may have been his teams best player, Gkonias' input was much more valuable to his team's performance.

Sorry for the delay mate, pretty busy weekend!

So looking at the game and not just the box score i was kinda a little dissapointed in Gkonias, 16 points, 6/9 shooting 8 rebounds, 3 assists, 4 blocks and 2 steals in 25 minutes is impressive, but most of that was in the last quarter which takes away from it as the game was already over. Having said that Quinn Kings still had their starters on so he was still against the best opposition possible in that last and took it to them. And realistically i think it should be pretty hard for a guy in a team that got smashed by 30 points to get a vote, and when Siffredi shot 8/27 he was hardly a stand out so I'm gonna agree with you on this one Mr Matt


So lets go with

3 - S. Rosales (GV)
2 - F. Cartier (GV)
1 - M.Gkonias (GV)

Why thank you Mr Cat, Mr Gkonias will be very pleased when I tell him the news!

Great work, +1, the judge has ruled!

Hey C-Cat,
I would like to appeal the MVP votes for my game this week please! :)

Viral Infections vs. Warren Bulls 133 - 72 At Blue Piggy Bank.
Have you ever just said Warren to amuse yourself? Warren,Warren......Warren. Very fascinating after you repeat it a few times. Team AWESOME WARREN BULLS vs DAY TRADING MARKETERS wasn't as close as us Guppies would have liked it. After Naker served up some of his players hips, teeth and walking frames, the Bulls will have to go back to the drawing board if they want another win. How did Naker's players manage to score 39 points in the final quarter? Wouldn't they need a ventilator or something by then? No one will know how Naker does it...maybe magnets?

3 Sidónio Conceição Viral Infections 43 PTS 7 REB 7 AST 3 STL 1 BLK. Easily the best player out there on the night.

2 Paolo Aloisi Warren Bulls 26 PTS 4 REB 1 AST 1 STL 1 BLK. This is a pity vote for the old fart. One of the biggest scorers on the night and solid all round game gives him 2 Fanny points.

1 Yuri Abruzzese Viral Infections 30 PTS 4 REB 6 AST 2 STL. Easily gets this vote just for his name alone. ABRUZZESEEEEEE!!!!

Link to the game is here: http://www.buzzerbeater.com/match/36141563/boxscore.aspx

Considering I won by 61 points, I hardly think the opposing team should get the second voting spot.
Also, Yuri scored 30 points at over 50% efficiency where as Paolo only scored 26 points at less than 33% efficiency. Yuri also played for 4 minutes less than Paolo so did more for each minute he was on the court.
Both players got 4 reobunds each, but Yuri got 6 assists compared to 1 assist for Paolo.
Also, Yuri kept his opponent to 4-12 where as Paolo allowed his opponent to score 44 points!

I would also like to propose that César Serre get the 1 point spot.
Serre played 6 minutes less than Paolo, and during this time he scored 23 points at 50% efficiency vs 26 points at less than 33% efficiency for Paolo. Both players got 4 rebounds but Serre managed an outstanding 11 assists compared to only 1 assist for Paolo.
Ratings might not mean too much, but a 14.5 ratings for Yuri and Cerre compared to a 5.5 rating for Paolo ought to be considered in my opinion.

Therefore, I propose that Yuri should get 2 votes, and Cerre should get 1 vote and Paolo should not get any votes.
Thank you,
Virus

i second this

sounds fair.

It was beyond a blowout...it was a demolition job

60 point loss and the loser gets 2 points

but my game down 9 with 4 mins to go & finally lose by 15 after the desperation tactics dont work & i get nothing cause noodles doesnt like goldfish (me?)

really doesnt add up i cant find another game that was decided by 15 or less ever where the loser got nothing

total bs

Last edited by abigfishy at 8/16/2011 6:29:58 PM

That's what the appeal process is for :)
And I think that in your game Xie should have gotten at least 1 point.