BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > More Precaution for NT Sabotage

More Precaution for NT Sabotage

Set priority
Show messages by
From: docend24

This Post:
00
183791.183 in reply to 183791.181
Date: 11/28/2011 11:42:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
He payed 1,1mil for him, when he first bought the player. How is that a high price for patriots?


I'm not talking about that, i'm suggesting to don't allow sabotage in BB.

I don't know if any colombian team tried to buy him (not necessary to say i adviced them to buy him), but it doesn't matter if a team from Colombia tried to buy him, since he is the owner of the player and will have enough money to keep raising the price if anyone bids.


Sabotage is cerainly not allowed. Nor is forcing other managers to play your way.

That's why colombian players can come into the game only in colombian teams. To get somewhere else they have to go through TL. So excuses like the owner can outbid anyone* are amusing.

* which is surely not always true, he doesn't get 100% back, money may not be available immediately because of the time differnce between servers etc.


Sabotage it's 100% legal, the rules doesn't it's ilegal, that's why i'm complaining this should be changed to stop this kind of moves.

In Spain we never did things like this(but it's legal), I can assure you that there are lot of managers that every week leave the game, is really easy to tell them that before they leave they buy 1 center from an important opponent to start annoying them.

Maybe in the next elections a nt coach could try to have a list of 20-30 teams(but in big countries it would be easy to be +50) that before going inactive, they try to sabotage other nt players, ;)


So some NT's use farms, others NT's can use sabotage to try to benefit, why not? If it's legal, haha ¡

You did (at least tried) sabotage others in Spain. By "you" I mean spanish users as a whole.

LOL, it is aeys to say them, hard to actually buy someone relevant. There have to be a seller first.

BBs stated what would be considered sabotage and that they would act accordingly. No matter how you would try to distort that.

To the last sentence - obviously you jsut need excuses, so you blame other NTs that they do well because do this or that. So far only attempt to sabotage directed at us was from Spain. So go figure...

Message deleted
Message deleted
This Post:
00
183791.188 in reply to 183791.184
Date: 11/29/2011 6:59:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
to remember for all, we don't like pillorys in the public forum and i know we should have act even earlier even when they are lot of reasonable voices.

If you expect NT sabotage report it through mail, and talk here about "solutions" not about cases.

Also it is forbidden, to talk about cases where you expect nt sabotage in the past or about fine you get through insulting the forum rules mentioned before.

This Post:
00
183791.189 in reply to 183791.188
Date: 11/29/2011 1:28:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
154154
to remember for all, we don't like pillorys in the public forum and i know we should have act even earlier even when they are lot of reasonable voices.

If you expect NT sabotage report it through mail, and talk here about "solutions" not about cases.

Also it is forbidden, to talk about cases where you expect nt sabotage in the past or about fine you get through insulting the forum rules mentioned before.

Source for that? I know questioning GM actions and reporting cheating is not allowwed on boards, never heard about this one.

Although I guess you didn't address to me speciafically, bu still.

Message deleted
This Post:
00
183791.191 in reply to 183791.189
Date: 11/29/2011 1:49:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
there is a point about discussing staff dicisions* on the forum rules, which applies here. also it creates something like a pillory in the forum which is also not desired.

PS: lets stay at discussing how we could avoid NT sabotage.

* which was included on the act of sabotage, i forget to mention in the explanation.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 11/29/2011 1:56:23 PM