BuzzerBeater Forums

Australia - IV.7 > Private League 6

Private League 6 (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
184241.176 in reply to 184241.175
Date: 5/13/2011 1:32:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5757
It's Mangoloids mate. I will crush you and your Sheeptown Shooters.

This Post:
00
184241.177 in reply to 184241.174
Date: 5/13/2011 1:32:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
372372
In that case I suggest utilising the 'Ron Artest' defense strategy.

This Post:
00
184241.178 in reply to 184241.177
Date: 5/13/2011 1:39:36 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
222222
I'm playing a rubbish team from a rubbish fed, and should win very easily. I predict 50+ points.

This Post:
00
184241.179 in reply to 184241.178
Date: 5/13/2011 1:49:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
372372
Agreed. Steve sucks.

This Post:
00
184241.180 in reply to 184241.179
Date: 5/13/2011 1:51:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
222222
In reality, I have little to no hope of winning, haha.

This Post:
00
184241.181 in reply to 184241.180
Date: 5/13/2011 1:59:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
191191
Just looking at your MVP votes.....looks like Smeltz got the Chris Judd tretment. Would have thought the 3 & 2 should have been the other way round. Better FG%, more points, blocks and a better +/- for Szadkowski.

Don't get me wrong Smeltz is the player i would rather have him on my team but in that game i reckon his stats were 2nd best.

Last edited by coachnoodles at 5/13/2011 1:59:57 AM

This Post:
11
184241.182 in reply to 184241.180
Date: 5/13/2011 2:16:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
372372
In reality, Steve still sucks.

;)

From: JW

This Post:
00
184241.183 in reply to 184241.181
Date: 5/13/2011 2:35:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
7070
Yeh for sure, Sadkowski definitely played better, Smeltz got the 3 pts purely because of his rating. The +/- was much better for him over Smeltz.
This is the way Smeltz has been getting MVP points all along so why change now hahahahah
jw


Last edited by JW at 5/13/2011 2:37:48 AM

From: Leeroy

To: JW
This Post:
00
184241.184 in reply to 184241.183
Date: 5/13/2011 2:40:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
241241
Lies. I've given him less before ^.^

From: coachnoodles

To: JW
This Post:
00
184241.185 in reply to 184241.183
Date: 5/13/2011 2:43:57 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
191191
If that's the case why didn't Bustos & Kozlej get votes?

This Post:
00
184241.186 in reply to 184241.181
Date: 5/13/2011 2:44:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
222222
I disagree, because Smeltz played 13 less minutes. He didn't have a PF or TO, either.

Smeltz's points per minute/rebounds per minute: 0.58/0.52
Szad's points per minute/rebounds per minute: 0.57/0.30

You can see that Smeltz did better on both counts, particularly on the boards.

Advertisement