BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Game shape with 60 min dropping??

Game shape with 60 min dropping??

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
163770.15 in reply to 163770.14
Date: 11/15/2010 3:31:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
WOW, then I can compete for B3 right now. I played guys 48 mins on Medicore Stamina in my last game & they came in at 13.5 & 12.5 on only $29k p\w, that is there season average. So you can see my point. I get 100% what your saying & yes it makes sense to me too, but that isn't what I am seeing from My Team.

Right is not a popularity contest!
This Post:
00
163770.16 in reply to 163770.1
Date: 11/15/2010 3:57:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
From my experience it is very difficult to keep a player at 9 GS (Proficient) from one week to the next. When I have a player at 9 GS I would say more than half of the time he drops back to 8 GS the following week, even if I play him 50-70min.

This Post:
00
163770.18 in reply to 163770.13
Date: 11/16/2010 1:51:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
This is really interesting. Until now, I thought players with good stamina get tired later in the game, thus their "skills" drop less/later.
It would make sense that players with good stamina can play more minutes per week and retain good game shape, although for now I don't believe it. I read the forums quite a lot and didn't see this anywhere. Maybe nobody tried it and we don't know it exists?

From: ClipCap

This Post:
11
163770.20 in reply to 163770.19
Date: 11/16/2010 10:14:47 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6161
What is the minutes differential between them?

Right is not a popularity contest!
This Post:
00
163770.21 in reply to 163770.20
Date: 11/18/2010 12:26:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Well, its just a hypothesis but i got the impression, while zoning in a bit and observing my players GS, that few more minutes , say around 80 maybe up to 85, arent that bad, infact are somehow beneficial if u come from a relative low GS like respectable and want to improve.
On the other hand those 85 mins are too much to keep up a nice GS, believe its proficient in engslih -not sure.
These Observations were made while i had no Doc and u also got to take into account the random factor, but this pattern seemed to occure over and over again.
Anyone the same thoughts on this or am i completely off ? :D

Last edited by Ludwig Van Spraydosen at 11/18/2010 12:27:41 PM

From: ig

This Post:
00
163770.24 in reply to 163770.23
Date: 11/20/2010 7:15:06 AM
Jerusalem TET
Ligat Ha'al
Overall Posts Rated:
207207
Second Team:
Jerusalem TET Utopia
My situation is even worse. My star (Ran Bass) was dropped from 8 to 7 this week despite having 62 weekly minutes, and this is not the first time he drops or stays at his GS (instead of popping or even double popping) despite of playing 50-70 minutes each week (except one with 85). In fact he did never reach GS of 9 this season despite playing close to optimal minutes each week. I know that there is a factor of randomness, but it seems that there is almost no affect of playing minutes on the GS difference. Why is this happening?

Last edited by ig at 11/20/2010 7:17:01 AM

This Post:
00
163770.25 in reply to 163770.24
Date: 11/20/2010 8:16:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
194194
You explained it yourself. This is random.
It happened to me as well. One week, I got majority of my players to play between 58-62 which I thought was superb, but it ended up (as far as I can remember), 2 player dropped, 5 stayed the same and 1 had a pop...so it is very random.

Advertisement