By your very explanation Patrick Ewing, Charles Barkley, Karl Malone, John Stockton, Dan Marino know nothing about their respective sports, because they never won a championship? That is some seriously flawed logic. Manon didn't say he wasn't trying to win with cookie cut builds ( which only show that you take the easiest way out), but that he is trying to build a team to win with his very own strategy. I'd rather play with and against people that play differently. That way when I see a different strategy/style, I know how to engage or defend it properly. It has nothing to do with win at all costs. You play to win, he plays to innovate, I play to have fun. Which one is right?
Edit for spelling
Last edited by WFUnDina at 2/22/2013 12:34:13 AM