BuzzerBeater Forums

Australia - IV.7 > Season 4 MVP Appeals

Season 4 MVP Appeals

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
185030.12 in reply to 185030.11
Date: 5/25/2011 6:41:00 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
Yeah I understand that. The point I'm trying to make is that it was against a team who played with a Sensational rating for OD. Considering that, the 6 TOs aren't, yeah not so great, but the fg and 3pt % is crazy good, as well as 4 assists.

From: yodabig

This Post:
00
185030.13 in reply to 185030.8
Date: 5/25/2011 6:50:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
So Axis123 is this an official appeal? Just say that it is and what you would like to see and we will get the big cat to make a ruling.

From: Axis123

This Post:
00
185030.14 in reply to 185030.13
Date: 5/25/2011 6:54:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
Yes, it is. For the reasons listed above.

From: C-Cat

This Post:
00
185030.15 in reply to 185030.8
Date: 5/25/2011 8:39:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
101101
Sorry mate i think I'm gonna have to go with the other guys on this one...

I think if anyone else deserves the 3 votes its Urbanowicz over Amatriain. Going on the points you made for Amatriain

He shot 5-11 which is impressive against Sensational D. Urbanowicz shot 4-9 so similar clip.
He dual lead the assists, well it was with Urbanowicz
He had 2 steals (0 blocks), Urban had 1 steal and 2 blocks
They both scored the same amount of points
Amatriain had 6 turnovers to Urbans 2
Amatriain also played more minutes

So realistically if anything was going to change it would be Urbanowicz into 3rd as he was clearly better then Amatriain. Ratings are far from the be all and end all also.

So sorry mate I'm gonna have to say just leave it as it is. I think if anyone was going to go to 3rd it certainly wasn't Amatriain and Bainsy clearly went with Sanchez for his defensive efforts and your rebounding advantage was one of the key reasons you got up so he deserves credit for that I'm not gonna bring in Urbanowicz for the sake of changing it!

Case Dismissed!

From: Axis123

This Post:
00
185030.16 in reply to 185030.15
Date: 5/25/2011 5:44:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
No problems.

Thanks for getting on it so fast.

From: whompa

This Post:
11
185030.17 in reply to 185030.15
Date: 5/25/2011 11:38:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5656
catta, was thinking big dewey only got the 2 votes but dropped in 46pts at 50% 6 boards a few assists zero turnovers, i thought stiff not to get 3 votes. thoughts?

This Post:
00
185030.18 in reply to 185030.17
Date: 5/26/2011 1:28:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Hey Whompa,
I've never seen you post before! Welcome :)

Just took a look at your game.
I think Cacho really should have been first as he was the top scorer for the winning team and also got the most rebounds.
I think Bowers at second is fair because even though he was by far the best player on either team (shooting 46 points in 39 minutes is amazing, and add the 6 rebounds and 3 assists and no turnovers and he is bloody fantastic), the reason I wouldn't put him first is because he wasn't on the winning team, and as many of you know, I strongly favour the winning team when deciding MVPs. But perhaps C-cat will disagree :P


Goodluck in your appeal :)

This Post:
00
185030.19 in reply to 185030.18
Date: 5/26/2011 1:49:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
Just for arguments sake, the winning team doesn't always get the MVP.

Last year, win or lose, Kobe had a strong case to win the Finals MVP, cause he was just amazing throughout the series (except the last game).

Just sayin' =)

This Post:
00
185030.20 in reply to 185030.18
Date: 5/26/2011 1:50:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5656
hey yeah first post, i understand the winning team could be favoured but when it is only by the last score in the match and did swing the game by himself in the last 5 mins.

This Post:
00
185030.21 in reply to 185030.20
Date: 5/26/2011 2:18:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
191191
I think in a game that close the 3 votes could go either way in my book. It's like the brownlow in the - the 3 votes should go to the best player on the ground not the best player on the winning team.

This Post:
00
185030.22 in reply to 185030.21
Date: 5/26/2011 2:35:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
We agree. We think it is pathetic that a lesser performance is rewarded because he was on the winning team when the match was decided by just one basket unless he was the one that was responsible for the last minute heroics. If the game was not close then that is a different matter.

Advertisement