BuzzerBeater Forums

Australia - IV.7 > Private League Part 5 :D

Private League Part 5 :D (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
176852.116 in reply to 176852.115
Date: 3/15/2011 9:45:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
222222
I thought the obvious overstated stupidity of my post would make it obvious that I agreed with you that it was ridiculous since the only thing you were beaten on was 1 rating, by 1 point.

This Post:
00
176852.117 in reply to 176852.115
Date: 3/16/2011 12:08:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6868
This game can come up with some strange names.

http://www.buzzerbeater.com/player/6742609/overview.aspx

This Post:
00
176852.118 in reply to 176852.1
Date: 3/16/2011 12:44:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
275275
Guys I never found out who Jeeves' new team is.
Link please?

Can you smell what the Hobos are cooking... oh wait its just Roger. (18085274)
From: yodabig
This Post:
11
176852.119 in reply to 176852.118
Date: 3/16/2011 5:37:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
Official Announcement

After protracted negociations a deal has finally been struck between the IV.7 Calamari and the Guppies. At the end of season three the following deal will take effect.

The Calamari will send CROCKERS (38606) Manager: bevers Country: Australia League: II.4 to the Guppies.

In exchange:

The Guppies will send shepparton shooters (196192) Manager: ezyfrag Country: Australia League: III.15 to the Calamari.


This deal is obviously more about letting players be on the Federations with their friends than anything strategic. It will also help to improve the league balance a little as the current top team the Calamari are giving up strength to the current bottom team the Guppies.

The teams are free to join their new Federations as soon as they are welcome but all results for season three will count for the Federations that they started the season with.

This Post:
00
176852.120 in reply to 176852.119
Date: 3/16/2011 9:13:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
222222
And NO-ONE leaked this early! Isn't that wonderful?

This Post:
00
176852.121 in reply to 176852.90
Date: 3/16/2011 9:23:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
809809
welcome ranga

hopefully there is room for top guys like you in here somewhere and we dont just all greb silent dudes with no personality from the abbl

a friend of mcbain is...someone with a dodgy friend

and can i smell a leak from a rabidcamel somewhere?

This Post:
00
176852.122 in reply to 176852.120
Date: 3/16/2011 10:02:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
lol , atleast you can keep some things quite :)

This Post:
00
176852.123 in reply to 176852.120
Date: 3/16/2011 9:00:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
129129
We think some Camels have big mouths.

This Post:
00
176852.124 in reply to 176852.123
Date: 3/17/2011 3:31:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
222222
I knew you weren't saving yourself for the 99 virgins.

From: Mr J

This Post:
00
176852.125 in reply to 176852.122
Date: 3/17/2011 9:22:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
441441
Hey guys. A question: Does anyone know exactly how the World Ranking of a team is calculated? Also, the Australian Ranking? Is it purely a win/loss ratio comparison?

This Post:
00
176852.126 in reply to 176852.125
Date: 3/17/2011 9:44:08 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6868
From the rules

Rankings

The world championships aren't the only way that national teams can compete for status. For every national team game that gets played, some number of ranking points get distributed between the participants. Even scrimmages are worth something, but the bigger the game, the more points get handed out. All ranking points that national teams receive, they keep for 28 weeks (i.e., two seasons). Points expire on a rolling basis.

The winning team gets a bigger share of the ranking points for a game, but it doesn't get all of them. Precisely how many points are received depends upon the relative strength of the two teams. If the teams are evenly matched, then the winning team will receive 75% of the points, and the losing team the other 25%. An underdog who scores an upset will get nearly 100%, but a strongly favored team that takes home a predictable victory will receive only a bare majority.

Although it's usually safe to assume that the team with more ranking points will be the one that we deem stronger, the two are not identical. We track teams' strength in a separate internal variable that we don't publish (so don't ask!). The algorithm we use is called Glicko-2 and is similar to the systems used by Baseball Prospectus and by the US Chess Federation. If you're interested in the gory details, click here, but the math might be scary. Don't complain that we didn't warn you.


http://math.bu.edu/people/mg/glicko/glicko2.doc/example.h...

Goodluck in understanding that.

Last edited by whitemaggot at 3/17/2011 9:44:42 AM

Advertisement