BuzzerBeater Forums

Scotland - I.1 > Relegation

Relegation

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
154787.11 in reply to 154787.10
Date: 09/28/2010 15:08:39
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I feel 3-2 has worked well for me against him as I won in my last game (although it was a buzzerbeater) and with 1-3-1 not being tested by myself thus far, it would be too risky. I played the first half of the season with man to man, and changed to 2-3 with my teams inside strengths but changed to 3-2 against run and gun teams, let's hope it pulls off!

Last edited by andrew-benson21 at 09/28/2010 15:09:03

This Post:
00
154787.12 in reply to 154787.11
Date: 09/28/2010 15:15:27
Overall Posts Rated:
88
You lost your 1st game away by 20+ pts playing 3-2. You won your home game but it's just 1 pt. What made you think you can win away this time just by having better game shape?

This Post:
00
154787.13 in reply to 154787.12
Date: 09/28/2010 15:18:01
Overall Posts Rated:
00
well if you had taken a closer look you would of seen I played normal and they played crunch time when they beat me by 20, I know for a fact my enthusiasm is higher too, when both teams have played same effort mine has come out on top.

This Post:
00
154787.14 in reply to 154787.13
Date: 09/28/2010 15:20:37
Overall Posts Rated:
88
Good luck then.

This Post:
00
154787.15 in reply to 154787.14
Date: 09/28/2010 15:21:19
Overall Posts Rated:
00
To you as well, looks like there's going to be a shock champion this season for sure

This Post:
00
154787.16 in reply to 154787.15
Date: 09/28/2010 15:38:35
Overall Posts Rated:
88
It's not a shock if you look at all the players he bought just before the playoff.

This Post:
00
154787.17 in reply to 154787.16
Date: 09/28/2010 15:41:04
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Agreed, just who would expect a team with a 12-10 record to be favourites?

This Post:
00
154787.18 in reply to 154787.17
Date: 09/28/2010 16:25:14
Overall Posts Rated:
88
He IS favourite before the playoff.

From: S.Bock

This Post:
00
154787.19 in reply to 154787.18
Date: 09/28/2010 17:51:40
Overall Posts Rated:
722722
but it's real funny, what he did!!

And it's a bit funny, that the strategy to wait just for 10 seasons and than to buy 5 players is more effictive than (real) managing teams for this time.

From: Chloe ^^

This Post:
00
154787.20 in reply to 154787.19
Date: 09/29/2010 13:08:56
Overall Posts Rated:
88
I suppose you alway lose some money on "agent fees" when you buy and sell, so waiting will be more economically efficient.

But wouldn't it be no fun to watch your team lose for so many games when you know you can do something about it? I'm a competitor myself so wouldn't be able to so self restraint if I see an opportunity to improve my team.

Now think I need to start over again next year with my roster (just like 2 seasons ago)

From: S.Bock

This Post:
00
154787.21 in reply to 154787.20
Date: 09/30/2010 04:07:35
Overall Posts Rated:
722722
But isn't there something like a "agent fee"... cause when you immediatly sell a player you get just 79% of the price, when there is your own rookie you get even 97%.

Did he just wait for 10 seasons? or did he train young guys and wait?

Advertisement