BuzzerBeater Forums

So basically. it seems legit for me to say that all the other d2 suck as I'm a part of 2.2 big 8? :p

Can You please remind me where you are on the ladder

so salaries is the only thing we rate teams and conferences on now?

i would say it doesnt mean shit cause better managers can better run teams with lower salaries.. give me 2.1 red side over 2.2 or 2.4 any day of the week.. they night not have the big salaries, but there are some damn good managers in those leagues... (not saying 2.1 red guys are crap, but i would rate the man running the team over the size of the salary any day of the week...)

Last edited by Skyhookz at 9/18/2012 3:38:20 AM

how can you rate these managers when you hardly know anything about them. you are simply grading the strength of conference on the teams you know and the managers who talk in the forums. wherease the II.1 Great 8 managers might be superior, but because they never post in the forums your opinion is lowered. seems a worse way that salaries to rate a conference.

I rate sides by how much I beat them:

1-5 = lucky lottery winner / line up error
6-10 = B3
11-15 = Abbl
16-20 = ex Abbl
21-30 = D2 vets
31-99 = the rest

:)

That's pretty fair I guess. Haha.

lol that is absurd! where did i say because they dont post in forums i dont rate them?? very quick to jump to conclusions there!

so salaries is the only thing we rate teams and conferences on now?

i would say it doesnt mean shit cause better managers can better run teams with lower salaries.. give me 2.1 red side over 2.2 or 2.4 any day of the week.. they night not have the big salaries, but there are some damn good managers in those leagues... (not saying 2.1 red guys are crap, but i would rate the man running the team over the size of the salary any day of the week...)

I agree. :-)

AFTER GAME 8


1. Guanzheng Goldfish 8 0 873 465 1.000 +408 (II.2) [1st Great 8]
2. Baxter Bogans 7 1 744 617 0.875 +127 (II.4) [2nd Big 8]
3. Skyhook Dreamers 7 1 738 664 0.875 +74 (II.1) [2nd Big 8]
4. The Players 6 2 852 591 0.750 +261 (II.3) [1st Great 8]
5. Awesome^.- 6 2 791 617 0.750 +174 (II.3) [1st Great 8]
6. Gisborne Gladiators 6 2 811 699 0.750 +112 (II.1) [2nd Great 8]
7. Home Axis 6 2 765 678 0.750 +87 (II.2) [2nd Big 8]
8. Moorditj Magick 5 3 768 594 0.625 +174 (II.4) [3rd Great 8]
9. Stone Slashers 5 3 770 656 0.625 +114 (II.2) [3rd Big 8]
10. Coalcliff Clippers 5 3 803 706 0.625 +97 (II.3) [3rd Great 8]
11. UWA Panthers 5 3 785 768 0.625 +17 (II.2) [3rd Great 8]
12. Raz0rbacks 4 4 737 686 0.500 +51 (II.3) [5th Great 8]
13. Hopelessly Addicted 4 4 771 745 0.500 +26 (II.3) [4th Big 8]
14. The Meateors 4 4 722 723 0.500 -1 (II.1) [5th Great 8]
15. Sonic Booms 3 5 632 646 0.375 -14 (II.4) [5th Big 8]
16. Skjim 3 5 640 705 0.375 -65 (II.4) [7th Big 8]
17. the Tornado 3 5 755 825 0.375 -70 (II.1) [5th Big 8]
18. Flaming Ramzays 2 6 655 755 0.250 -100 (II.4) [8th Big 8]
19. Puffy_Inch 2 6 579 698 0.250 -119 (II.2) [6th Great 8]
20. Fresh Princes 0 8 604 726 0.000 -122 (II.1) [8th Great 8]

then how do you rate their managers better than ours?? both 2.2 and 2.4 red sides managers are in the same division as the 2.1 red side managers. so how do you distinguish between the managers in those conferences being better than the managers in mine? what kind of parameters do you go off?

Last edited by MrGoodKat at 9/18/2012 9:59:57 AM