BuzzerBeater Forums

I whould like to know on what position I should put these players, please let me know your opinion and the reason why!

Player 1:

Jump Shot: prominent Jump Range: proficient
Outside Def.: respectable Handling: respectable
Driving: average Passing: average
Inside Shot: pitiful Inside Def.: mediocre
Rebounding: average Shot Blocking: pitiful
Stamina: mediocre Free Throw: average

Player 2:

Jump Shot: proficient Jump Range: sensational
Outside Def.: respectable Handling: respectable
Driving: mediocre Passing: mediocre
Inside Shot: average Inside Def.: mediocre
Rebounding: awful Shot Blocking: atrocious
Stamina: strong Free Throw: average

Player 3:

Jump Shot: prolific Jump Range: strong
Outside Def.: respectable Handling: average
Driving: mediocre Passing: average
Inside Shot: average Inside Def.: inept
Rebounding: awful Shot Blocking: average
Stamina: inept Free Throw: inept


Thanks for letting me know!

probably all three at SG. You cou;d try Player two at SF, or Player on at Pg, but they are probably better as a SG

They all are good shooters, but they all lack either inside skills to be a SF or handling/passing to be a great pure PG.

Last edited by packer_22 at 3/22/2009 12:55:26 PM

Player 1 at PG , the other 2 are fine SG's

They are SG's but can be played also as SF I'd say. Also PG if you don't have better ones with Handling and Passing, which I assume you do have, if you have great sooting players like this.:)

Player 1 at PG , the other 2 are fine SG's

PG?

For me thats all SF, and all lacks in defense. Maybe you could play then SF, but with their id their lack of defense becomes even worse.

For me thats all SF, and all lacks in defense.

I agree for the defence, especially if they are supposed to be SGs. However, for SFs their inside skills are quite weak. I rather consider them SGs but I am curious how you argue this, CrazyEye?

The second one is interesting as he sould be a great 3point SG. Not really strong at passing but otherwise he could be great in Princeton tactics. (3 pointers or playing the big guys)

I rather consider them SGs but I am curious how you argue this, CrazyEye?

i normally won't play then anyway, and someone else brings the SF into the game ;) And as SF they got not that bad, with outside tactics because the lack of OD isn't that hard there, but you got additional problem with ID.

The second one is interesting as he sould be a great 3point SG. Not really strong at passing but otherwise he could be great in Princeton tactics.

i don't see any team who could be great with princeton :) In my eyes this tactic ****, ok sometimes it is usefull to avoid blowout in the friendly but else?