Hello everyone,
If I am not wrong, in the past it was not suggested to look for 19 years old draft players (abilities were same as 18 years old and had one year less to train) but last draft I got a 19 years old guy who had 8 of a few abiity which makes me think that at some point of my absence (one-two years) it has been fixed and now 19 years old can be nicer from start.
Is that right? Would you then suggest getting 19 years old draft players or is still not compensated enough?