I would like to know which is the points of views of the three managers that candidate themself for the NT election on creating a structure like this:
18-21 yo me and my scouts
22-24 yo an intermediate coach that has the responsability to grow PG/SG/SF to elevate secondaries skills also on NT (for example passing and HND, DRI, IS that on LI are essential, passing to have good circulation, HND on constrasting team with lots of pressure) and elevate OD, and PF/C to elevate RB and ID (that on U21 can be built with limits, IS on U21 is essential)
25-27 yo an upper-intermediate coach that has the responsability to increase PG/SG/SF/PF/C on, PG/SG/SF (for outside offence) on JR/JS (that pop fastly) expecially JR for a LI, on SF (inside offence), PF, C on 1 on 1 SF/PF, some passing, and JS SF/PF.
27 on the real coach to plasmate the players as he want.
It can be possible to organize with me a work like this??
Then, how many times you would dedicate yourselves on a weeks: it's important to controll players on TL to save them from retired and players sold (to evitate China, HK or some nations we know take them to BOTfor a season...), controll managers follow your work and your plan of training, ask every weeks if there are some pop up to involve managers to continue training constantly, involve managers with money to take trainer level 5 or more and something else.
So, i'm ready to conduce U21 on success for this season and the next mandate (season 26-27).
NOW IT'S TIME TO BUILD A SOLID STRUCTURE WITH NOT ONLY 2 COACHES and few scouts for U21. Indo to win on NT needs working proxies!!
Last edited by IT_force (ITA Coach) at 9/18/2013 7:46:51 AM