Well, let's put it this way. They all have issues with the current situation, even Malice recognised as much.
There is one side (Trainerman) proposing a solution. There is another side saying they recognise the problem but dismissing any solution. I don't see any constructive criticism from this second side.
If they do believe there is a problem they should also propose a solution, not just criticise proposals from others. Otherwise if there is a problem and they don't have any better solution they should ask the managers in that situation what they think about the proposals which have been put forward (even if they don't agree with them).
My guess is nobody wants to ask the managers in micronations because they would vote to be able to change the nation given the choice (one of the proposals from Trainerman)
That is not a solution for the micronations, that is a solution for some users.
There you are, the heart of the matter.
Yes this is indeed the heart of the matter and if there are no better proposals (do you have any? Just curious) they should let them vote, because the same argument applies tenfold to the current system ("it only works for some users"), as it actually works for no known user (even Malice isn't entirely happy with the current situation).
Last edited by Lemonshine at 1/23/2015 12:44:26 PM